Conflict of interest disclosure and interpretation – rest assured the medical professional in the audience is perceptive, alert and smart

INTRODUCTION:We present data from a systematic survey on conflict of interest (COI) disclosure and its interpretation by the doctors participating in continuing medical education (CME).METHODS:A brief 12 question online Google survey with multiple choice options (read, select, and click) was done among Indian practicing doctors using links shared through WhatsApp through the internet over a 72 h period.RESULTS:Of the 386 replies, 373 unique replies were eligible for evaluation. The majority found CME activities beneficial. About 73% of participants would watch out for bias, even if the speaker shows COI disclosure slide. The use of brand/trade names was considered as a flag for bias by the majority. About 99% wanted the speaker to show a final take home message slide. Cross verification of the data presented by comparing to published data was done in more than 75% of instances by only 25% of the participating doctors. A significantly higher number of doctors found bias when CME activities were being organized by the health-care industry as compared to programs of medical bodies/societies/organizations.DISCUSSION:COI considerations are given due to the importance of medical professionals. However, doctors are smart enough to understand the limitations of such disclosures and remain alert to ensure they are not influenced by any bias. Take home message slide gives the presenters opportunity to share their insights and allows the audience to make their own judgment on the impartiality of the data presented. The doctors are aware that bias could be more when CME activities are organized by healthcare industry and take appropriate precautions.CONCLUSION:COI is is given due importance by the medical professionals. COI disclosures are often incomplete. Doctors remain alert to ensure they are not influenced by biased presentations. Concluding take home message slide is unanimously recommended. Presentation bias is more when healthcare industry is directly organizing educational and promotional activities.

Superficial CD34-positive fibroblastic tumor in the forearm of a middle-aged patient: A newly described, rare soft-tissue tumor

Superficial CD34-positive fibroblastic tumor is a recently described soft-tissue tumor entity. A 48 year-old-male presented with a gradually increasing soft-tissue mass in his right forearm of 2 years' duration, along with multiple subcutaneous soft-tissue nodular lesions, and reminiscent of lipomas over his body. He underwent a wide excision of his forearm mass. Microscopic sections showed a circumscribed tumor in the dermis and subcutaneous fat, composed of spindle cells, inflammatory cells, including lymphocytes, plasma cells, and eosinophils, along with interspersed markedly pleomorphic giant cells containing moderate-to-abundant “glassy” cytoplasm, vesicular nuclei, exhibiting prominent nucleoli, and intranuclear pseudoinclusions. There were no significant mitotic figures, areas of hemorrhage, necrosis, or pigment histiocytes. By immunohistochemistry, the tumor cells were diffusely positive for CD34 while negative for cytokeratin (CK), pan CK (AE1/AE3), S100 protein, CD30, and CD31. MIB1/Ki-67 was low and highlighted 4%–5% tumor nuclei. Diagnosis of superficial CD34-positive fibroblastic tumor was offered. Sections from the various resection margins were free of tumor. Postresection, the patient is alive with no evidence of disease for the past 8 months. This constitutes as one of the first case reports of this rare tumor entity from our country. Its diagnostic and treatment implications are discussed herewith.

Epidemiological data and case load spectrum of patients presenting to bone and soft tissue disease management group at a tertiary cancer center.

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to know the spectrum and number of bone and soft tissue (BST) tumors presenting to our institute. We needed to assess the gap between the number of patients seen and infrastructure available, and based on this information, help formulate guidelines for optimum utilization of resources and to provide best possible evidence‑based cancer care. SETTINGS AND DESIGNS: This is a prospective observational study (epidemiological). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included all new patients seen in BST‑disease management group (DMG) in the year 2010. An audit form was devised to capture all the relevant information. A comparison of our data with other national and international studies was also done. RESULTS: Out of total 31,951 new patients registered at our institute, 2007 patients availed BST‑DMG services. Sixty percent were bone tumors and 36% were soft tissue tumors. In bone tumor, 66% were malignant, 15% were benign, and 19% were non-neoplastic. Osteosarcoma (43%) was the most common malignant tumor followed by primitive neuroectodermal tumor/Ewing’s (27%) and chondrosarcoma (11%). Giant cell tumor was the most common benign bone tumor. Eighty‑one percent of all soft tissue lesions were malignant, of which 75% were of mesenchymal origin and 25% were of cutaneous origin. CONCLUSION: This is an attempt to document the epidemiology of musculoskeletal tumors presenting to our institution while guiding the institute to frame and implement disease‑specific protocols and generate further research questions. Continued data collection and follow‑up can provide valuable information on long‑term survival and treatment‑related toxicities. This data (within limitations) may be extrapolated to national level to identify the need for infrastructure and human resources.

Clinical significance of geographic miss when using conventional four field radiotherapy technique in treatment of locally advanced carcinoma cervix.

BACKGROUND: Although conventional four‑ field radiotherapy based on bony landmarks has been traditionally used, areas of geographical miss due to individual variation in pelvic anatomy have been identified with advanced imaging techniques. AIMS: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the geographical miss in patientswhen using the conventional four‑field planningplanning and to find out the impact of 3‑D conformal CT based in patients with locally advanced carcinoma cervix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 50 patients, target volume delineation was done on planning computed tomography (CT) scans, according to guidelines by Taylor et al. Patients were treated with modified four field plan, except for the superior, where field border was kept at L4‑L5 interspace A dosimetric comparison was done between the conventional four‑field based on bony landmarks and the target volume delineated on computed tomography. The disease free survival, pelvic and para aortic nodal free survival, distant failures free survival were calculated using Kaplan Meir Product Limit Method. RESULTS: Patients were followed‑up for a median period of 11 months. The median V95 for conventional and modified extended four field plans were 89.4% and 91.3% respectively. Patients with V95 for modified extended pelvic fields less than 91.3% had a trend toward inferior disease free survival (mean DFS 9.8 vs. 13.9 months) though the difference was not statistically significant log rank test. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data shows trend toward lower DFS in patients with inadequate target volume coverage. We recommend routine use of CT based planning for four field technique.

Impact of delay in inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with carcinoma of penis.

Aim: To study the impact of delay in inguinal lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis, who have indications for LND at the time of presentation. Materials and Methods: In total, 28 patients (mean age 52.1 ± 12.8 years) with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis, treated from January 2000 to June 2008, were retrospectively studied with regard to clinical presentation, time of LND, and the outcome. The patients were divided into two groups based on the time for LND. Group 1 patients had LND at mean of 1.7 months (range 0-6 months) of treatment of the primary lesion, and group 2 had LND at a mean of 14 months (range 7-24 months) after treatment of the primary lesion. Statistical Analysis: The statistical analysis of survival was done using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log Rank test, with p < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant. The Mann-Whitney test and Fisher's exact test were used for univariate comparison. Results: Twenty-three of the 28 patients had inguinal LND. In group 1, of 13 patients, 12 were alive, with no recurrence of disease at a mean follow-up of 37 months (8-84) months. In group 2, only two patients were alive and disease-free, at a mean follow-up of 58 months (33-84 months). The five-year cancer-specific survival rates for early and delayed LND were 91 and 13%, respectively, (p = 0.007). Conclusions: When compliance with follow-up is suspect, patients with high grade or T stage (greater than T1) tumor are better treated by inguinal LND during the same hospital admission or within two months of primary treatment.